Many times people who have to attend Court as a Litigant in Person will become flustered and a bit tongue tied. Judges are very patient with Litigants in Person but you may feel that you need extra support when you are having to attend Court on your own.
This problem can be resolved by you taking a professional Mackenzie Friend with you and below is a copy of the The Right Honourable Sir Declan Morgan Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland Guidance on what Mackenzie Friends can and can not do.
If you would like to us to provide a professional Mackenzie Friend for you please telephone us on 07940 384785 or contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Obviously the length of each case differs however there can be a considerable amount of hanging around at Court and we confirm that our charges for attend Court with you in London are £60.00 for a half day and £120 for a whole day. If your case is outside of London our fee will also include our travel expenses.
2 ) There is a presumption in favour of permitting a personal litigant to have reasonable assistance from a layperson, sometimes called a McKenzie Friend. Personal litigants assisted by McKenzie Friends remain litigants-in-person. McKenzie Friends have no independent right to provide assistance. They have no right to act as advocates or to carry out the conduct of litigation. In McA v McA  10 BNIL 63, Master Redpath held that a McKenzie Friend may be allowed a right of audience in very exceptional circumstances.
3 ) McKenzie Friends may:
4 ) McKenzie Friends may not:
It is a criminal offence to exercise rights of audience or to conduct ligitation unless properly qualified and authorised to do so by an appropriate regulatory body or with leave of the court. The very exceptional circumstances in which a McKenzie Friend can apply for rights of audience or to conduct litigation are set out in paragraphs [14-18] below.
5 ) A McKenzie Friend must observe strict confidentiality in relation to any documents they have sight of and any information they hear in relation to the proceedings. Breach of such confidentiality will usually amount to a contempt of court, giving rise to sanctions including a fine and imprisonment.
5 ) While personal litigants ordinarily have a right to receive reasonable assistance from McKenzie Friends the court retains the power to refuse to permit the giving of such assistance. The refusal may occur on initial application or at any time during the hearing.
6 ) A personal litigant may be denied the assistance of a McKenzie Friend or a particular McKenzie Friend because its provision might undermine or has undermined the efficient administration of justice. Illustrations of circumstances where this might arise, which are not exhaustive, are:
7 ) The following factors are NOT of themselves sufficient to justify the court refusing to permit a McKenzie Friend to assist a personal litigant:
8 ) A personal litigant who wishes to exercise this right should inform the judge as soon as possible indicating the identity of the proposed McKenzie Friend. The proposed McKenzie Friend should produce a short curriculum vitae or other statement setting out relevant experience, confirming that he or she has no personal interest in the case and understands the McKenzie Friend's role and the duty of confidentiality.
9 ) The court may refuse to allow a personal litigant to exercise the right to receive assistance at the start of a hearing. The court may also circumscribe or remove the right during the course of a hearing,where the court forms the view that a McKenzie Friend, or a particular McKenzie Friend, may give, has given, or is giving, assistance which impedes the efficient administration of justice. Tthe court may in the first instance issue a firm and unequivocal warning to the personal litigant and/or McKenzie Friend. It is likely that the court may give reasons for refusal and the personal litigant, but not the McKenzie Friend has a right to appeal the decision.
10 ) Where a personal litigant is receiving assistance from a McKenzie Friend in care proceedings, the court should consider the desirability of the McKenzie Friend's attendance at any joint consultations directed by the court and, if he or she is to attend, the most effective and appropriate way in which that person should be involved in the joint consultation, bearing in mind the limits of their role, and should give directions accordingly.
11 ) Personal litigants are in general permitted to communicate any information, including filed evidence, relating to the proceedings to McKenzie Friends for the purpose of obtaining advice or assistance in relation to the proceedings. In the case of proceedings involving children, however, this may only be done with the permission of the judge. This requires an application to the judge for permission and if the judge grants it then ordinarily conditions will be imposed giving further protection to confidentiality.
12 ) Legal representatives of other parties should ensure that documents are served on personal litigants in good time to enable them to seek assistance regarding their content from McKenzie Friends in advance of any hearing or advocates' meeting.
13 ) Rights of audience and the right to conduct litigation on behalf of another are not part of the function of a McKenzie Friend but the following paragraphs apply to a McKenzie Friend, or to another individual, who wishes to apply for such a right. Unlike an application for reasonable assistance from a McKenzie Friend, there is no presumption in favour of granting these rights. Application should be made at the earliest possible opportunity and preferably before the hearing.
14 ) Courts should be slow to grant any application from a personal litigant for a right of audience or a right to conduct litigation to any lay person, including a McKenzie Friend. This is because a person exercising such rights must ordinarily be properly trained, be under professional discipline (including an obligation to insure against liability for negligence) and be subject to an overriding duty to the court. These requirements are necessary for the protection of all parties to litigation and are essential to the proper administration of justice.
15 ) Only very exceptional circumstances will justify the grant of a right of audience to a lay person, including a McKenzie Friend. Examples are health problems or disability issues which preclude the personal litigant from addressing the court or conducting litigation where qualified legal representation is not available to the personal litigant.
16 ) The grant of a right of audience or a right to conduct litigation to lay persons who hold themselves out as professional advocates or professional McKenzie Friends or who seek to exercise such rights on a regular basis, whether for reward or not, will equally only be granted in exceptional circumstances. To do otherwise would tend to subvert the will of Parliament.
17 ) Rights of audience and the right to conduct litigation are separate rights. The grant of one right to a lay person does not mean that a grant of the other right has been made. If both rights are sought their grant must be applied for individually and justified separately.
18 ) Personal litigants can enter into lawful agreements to pay fees to McKenzie Friends for the provision of reasonable assistance in court or out of court by, for instance, carrying out clerical or mechanical activities, such as photocopying documents, preparing bundles, delivering documents to opposing parties or the court, or the provision of legal advice in connection with court proceedings. Such fees cannot be lawfully recovered from the opposing party.
19 ) Fees claimed to have been incurred by McKenzie Friends for carrying out the conduct of litigation, where the court has not granted such a right, cannot lawfully be recovered from either the personal litigant for whom they carry out such work or the opposing party.
20 ) Fees claimed to have been incurred by McKenzie Friends for carrying out the conduct of litigation after the court has granted such a right are in principle recoverable from the personal litigant for whom the work is carried out. Such fees cannot be lawfully recovered from the opposing party.
21 ) Fees claimed to have been incurred by McKenzie Friends for exercising a right of audience following the grant of such a right by the court are in principle recoverable from the personal litigant on whose behalf the right is exercised. Such fees are also recoverable, in principle, from the opposing party as a recoverable disbursement: Rules of the Court of Judicature 1980 Order 62 rules 18(1) and 18(2).
Signed: The Right Honourable Sir Declan Morgan, Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland, 5 September 2012
 Master Redpath stated that the principles used in English statute should be applied here. They were originally contained in sections 27 and 28 of the Courts and Legal Services Act 1990, but now see Part III and Schedule 3 of the Legal Services Act 2007, which replicates the court's general discretion to grant a right of audience or right to conduct litigation in particular proceedings. The factors set out in this Practice Note will be relevant to the exercise of this discretion.
 To avoid contravening s. 12 and Schedule 2 Part II of the Administration of Justice Act 1960 and, Art. 10 (2) of the Children (NI) Order 1995
Tell us your legal concerns for an assessment of how we can help.Get A Quote